Month: December 2018

The First Circuit affirmed Defendant’s conviction and sentence without prejudice to his right to raise his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in a collateral proceeding brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255, holding that Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim ought not to be aired for the first time on direct appeal. Defendant pleaded guilty to violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. 2423(a) and was sentenced to a 327-month term of immurement. On appeal, Defendant argued for the first time that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The First Circuit…

The First Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Appellant’s federal petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, holding that the district court did not err in dismissing the petition. In his petition, Appellant challenged his convictions under Massachusetts law for murder and other offenses, arguing that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, in violation of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The district court denied relief. Because Appellant’s case was adjudicated on the merits in state court, the Antiterrorism and Effective Death…

The Supreme Court affirmed Defendant’s 109-month sentence for possession of child pornography, holding that the government did not violate the plea agreement in this case and that the district court did not err in applying an enhancement for knowingly distributing child pornography. Defendant entered a guilty plea to the charge of possession of child pornography. The district court sentenced Defendant to a 109-month term of immurement. On appeal, Defendant argued that the government breached the terms of the plea agreement by failing to advocate for the bargained-for sentence and that…

The First Circuit affirmed Defendant’s convictions and sentence for conspiring to defraud the United States and stealing government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371, 641, holding that there was sufficient evidence to support Defendant’s convictions and that the sentence was procedurally reasonable. Specifically, the First Circuit held (1) there was ample evidence from which a jury could have reasonably determined that Defendant was a knowing and willing participant in a fraudulent scheme of claiming eligibility for Social Security benefits and receiving nearly $100,000 in disability insurance disbursements to which…

The First Circuit affirmed Defendant’s conviction of being a felon in possession of a firearm an ammunition and sentence to time served plus three weeks of imprisonment and three years of supervised release, holding that any error was harmless. Specifically, the Court found (1) the district court did not err in denying Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of the firearm; (2) the district court did not err in granting the government’s motion in limine to preclude Defendant from asserting a necessity defense; and (3) the district court committed a significant…